not even sure how i would use that as i am watching via this site and not dl

Shes been a lesbian since the new 52 reboot years ago. DC comics created this character, and this show is a fairly true interpretation of the new 52 Batwoman.

its more related to what kinda hero he is .. i thot he was “no kills” like batman, in the comic version

thats an odd one .. that alley scene where he and laurie get attacked .. did they kill top knots in the comic? they did in the film .. dont remember

oh yeh the film has some amazing moments .. comedian attacking protesters and stuff, gold

yeh i think cap metropolis and hooded justice were a thing .. hard to be sure

i think thats because its basically impossible to cram a story like that into movie length .. apart from that, it seemed an excellent production to me .. but it needed a 12 ep miniseries, then it would have been perfect

if only! tho it doesnt seem to match the films reality .. here, veidt dropped a fake alien attack, like the comic .. not a fake manhattan attack

I like old Negan more than I ever liked young Negan.

Looks like Jason Momoa’s character from “Frontier”, but sounds like Jason Momoa from “SG Atlantis”.

That was cool.

The return of “The Midnight Society”, cool.

I’m going to miss this show.

Wealthy Heiress/Circus Performer, so just as illogical as it ever was.
Truest statement I’ve read all night

The character is not a grey area of the unknown, she’s a heterosexual character. Morally grey, yes. Romantically and sexually, no. I am not angry, I want you to leave me alone and stop replying to my comments. So again GO AWAY PLEASE AND THANK YOU.

She was heterosexual FORMER circus performer and HEIRESS - Batman is also a Heterosexual character and very much interested in sex, so again you’re wrong on that statement as well. He’s had multiple female partners from Barbra Gordon (bat girl) to Tailia Al Ghul and is married to Catwoman in some instances. He’s also been married to Harley Quinn. I am being dismissive to you and your continued insistence to be on my comments, because I personally find you to be a soapboxing troll with a need to have the last word. I’ve asked you repeatedly to cease commenting and yet here you are. Leave me alone, no further comments no passing go.

the character regardless of what you think/feel/say is a heterosexual character.

You have taken it upon yourself to inform EVERY SINGLE PERSON in various comments that and I will direct quote you here, “The original 1950s Katherine Kane was not a lesbian and in fact was a circus performer. She was a beard for Batman, which sucked, because it was obvious Robin is gay and batman is damaged beyond the point of loving in that way.” - That is exactly what you have said to me, when it was explained with detailed FACTS that the character you have beating about the comments is not the character that this show is based off you have continued to harass me in particular. Now then as I have proven that your soapboxing a character that does not exist in the current DCU as anything other than a mention or side note character from a non-canonical line of the series, it useless and that pointing it out to every person is a mote point can you kindly cease the replies to me because I really do not want to see a notification from you in my inbox again.

First of all - I never said she did not bring anything into the role. I explained that she was given a script written by a man, based on a book that was written by a man and in the film she was directed by a man. In that portion of the Book and Film series Clarice Starling was not a sexually active character as she was a student put into a case assignment based on her performance in schooling and training. When pointed out that she is not a sexually “grey” character as you put it you’ve gone on the defence about how your opinion of her and the writer who created the character in general is far better than that of the given facts that point out that a character who was played by a lesbian actress and a hetero actress is in fact a woman of the hetero persuasion and ended up with the man she has been chasing her entire career. I am far from angry or perturbed or any other adjective you’d like to spew at me. I am simply stating facts that the strong HETEROSEXUAL character of Clarice Starling is indeed a HETEROSEXUAL character who is in the media and thus apart of the entire genre of strong independent women who for the most part needed exactly zero men to save her while maintaining her HETEROSEXUALITY and non-lesbian status. Now kindly go away.

That isn’t how I see it, get your head out of the clouds and actually do a bit of research about the characters you’re talking about and maybe learn that this character and the one you’ve been so loving holding onto this entire time are two separate characters from two entirely different ages/eras of comic books. If they choose to make a new version of Kate Kane and she’s not a lesbian then of well, its not likely to happen given that there is a rather large following in the LGBT+ community who read about this particular character; who have had such a demand for her that what do you know she got a TV series.

Ted Tally is a man who wrote the screenplay. Jody Foster worked based on his writing and she was directed by another man, Jonathan Demme.

Past 50 years? Don’t be daft. The character did not even survive a decade in comics before being abandoned. The 2006 one, has the longevity and thusly the seniority. there’S a hell of a lot more out there on Kate Kane than Kathy Kane.

There are plenty of people who are terrible writers in general, you choosing to dismiss the canonical ending of a book series because it doesn’t suit your agenda or what you believe should be done when writing women doesn’t mean you’re right. The series ends with them together. And I wasn’t talking about Jodie Foster, as she was only in the first film, Julianne Moore was the one who reprised the role of Clarice Starling in the film adaptation of Hannibal.

I am well aware of Kathy Kane and her entire existence coming into play in 1956 a solid two years after the publication of a book that cause people to question if the fictional character of Batman was indeed gay or not; she was removed from the DCU in 1964 and then in the 70’s a limited series Crisis on Infinite Earths re-established that Batwoman’s existence was on an Earth separate from DC’s main continuity. Ergo the hetero-love interest of Kathy Kane is not apart of the DCU as anything but a side character. The character of Kate Kane was reintroduce in 2006 week 7 of the 52 and then after the DC Rebirth it was made apparent that she is now Bruce Wayne’s cousin and a lesbian. Yes there are random instances of mentions of Kathy in the new model of the DCU but that still does not change that fact that Kate Kane and Kathy Kane are two entirely separate characters and that the one this entire show is based off of is a lesbian.

If you ever read the books you know that Clarice Starling (or a woman strongly suggested to beher) actually was seen with Dr Lecter after he made his escape. She went with him, and isn’t a unknown sexual character.

The character is gay in the comics… soooo…

Is anyone else P.O’ed by the stereotype that a strong, independent fighting woman has to be gay? Why can’t we have a straight, strong, independent fighting woman? I am sick of the stereotype. The few times when we have an independent, straight, fighting woman, most of the time she has to be rescued still by a man. Show a straight woman who can handle herself in a fight. Break that stereotype. I’m not against gays. I’m against stereotyping that all strong, aggressive, fighting women have to be gay.

Ripley from aliens, Sarah Connor from Terminator, wonderwoman, captain marvel, Clarice sterling from silence of the lambs, the Bride from kill Bill, Buffy the Vampire slayer, just a few off the top of the head, Also Batwoman is gay in the comics soo…..

Man, this show has some lazy writing, every character comes off like a “Mary Sue”. The over all arcs are cool, then they way them down with shoehorned conversations and unrealistic social dynamics. I don’t get why they can have adult themes and ideas then blow it by righting an angsty teens journal entry.