This was a good movie, however having read the book, I did not like the changes…especially the ending. I feel the same about The Shining with Jack Nicholson. If not for the fact that this had to be changed somewhat because it was made as a sequel to the original movie The Shining, I probably would have enjoyed it more. Of course I enjoyed it a lot more than The Dark Tower and IT parts one and two, all of which I feel were written by people who either never read the books or just read a Cliff’s Notes version. 2/5

You completely missed the point. This is a direct sequel to the first one, Making the other ones previously made not part of the cannon/story line. which John Carpenter(who had a hand in this) gave the green light to do, And now currently there are 2 more under production to finish the series. Not to mention H2O and Resurrection were terrible and should be wiped from the list all together imo.

I thought this movie sucked! They completely forgot about most of the previous movies when writing this one. Some of which the person they dedicated this one to produced/directed. How is completely effing with his previous storylines (and those of John Carpenter) a dedication to him? What happened to Laurie’s son from H2O? Why isn’t Jamie from 4 and 5 mentioned at all? What happened to the fact Laurie was killed in Resurrection? This is definitely one I will not be watching again. The best thing about it was Jamie Lee Curtis.

This was actually quite enjoyable. Loved seeing a lot my favorites from classic horror movies in this. Was suspenseful with a funny ending. Two thumbs up! 5/5

Couldn’t even make it through the first 10 minutes it was so bad.