So Disney destroyed several canons they made by killing their parents officially at sea to make this movie?? Lame sauce, bad songs and terrible plot.

If you have read the book / listened to the book do not watch this movie - it cuts out 99% of the more interesting concepts from the book and changes how things were done. Boring film.

I agree. No offense, I don’t think they should have made her gay. I, personally, would prefer a single woman who dates around and maybe has a child at home. Trust me, finding someone who isn’t intimidated by that can be extremely difficult!

Beg to differ. She started out in the 1960’s as Batgirl. She was police commissioner Gordon’s daughter, and she was a potential love interest for Adam West’s batman. Besides, my comment was not about the character’s being gay so much as it is about there not being one, lead female comic book superhero who has to balance dating and/or family with supernatural powers. Yes, Wonderwoman has her man, but she doesn’t get to date around. Jessica Jones sleeps around, but you never see her in loving relationships. Susan Storm isn’t the lead. That leaves what? Alien? That’s not a comic book.

FASTEST.RELATIONSHIP.EVER.

And yet even as I say this, it’s very on brand for the Lesbian stereotypes. Including the running into our ex’s EVERYWHERE.

Officially the show has begun and it’s no longer a who is the dark knight, but at the same time it’s a little annoying that villians are able to guess and know who’s under the mask.

See this is an episode I would have liked for the series premiere, this strange slow burn of how things come together. Very good episode, far better than the first.

I had been a huge fan of the first godzilla film and then when I heard this one was coming I was ecstatic… now of course I am finding out that Kong is apart of this franchise and I have yet to see that film. Well then I know what I am doing this next weekend.

At first I was only going to leave a review about how funny it was to watch two different movies that feature the same man played by two men who were both on Game of Thrones. But I am leaving a review that says this is beautiful, breathtaking even. I spent the last half hour of the film crying and sang along with all the songs because they’ve been apart of my life since I was born. 10 out of 10 or full 5 stars.

That was weirder than the first, I am not sure what I just saw.. need to process this. 3 out of 5

yeah i’ve seen all both the original movie its sequel and the SAC and the arise stuff…in my opinion all good stuff. if you haven’t guessed yet im a ghost in the shell fanatic LMAO!!!!!

The movie plays out like an older Quinton Tarantino film, the varied chapters and slight deviations in how it plays out. The surprises about what you assumed and now what you’re seeing the more you watch of the film. The soundtrack was spot on for the era and the feel of it all was rather quirky and unexpected. I give it a full 5 stars for getting me that invested into the characters and plot lines of the film.

This film is highly worth a watch through, even if you’re not interested in comic books or superhero based films. this is a solid 7.5/10 from me or 4 out of 5 stars.

The film feels as though it is longer when in truth it is much shorter than it seems, which is how Tolkien wrote his books as well. They seem long and dull with to many words to describe the events of the day or the way a leaf upon a tree would look. But in fact it was precise and to the point about a brief period in the life of a man whose contributions to the realm of fantasy and make-believe was what created countless works inspired by him. Interesting film for a interesting man, you can see the beginning of each of his characters in the people who influenced his life.

For a kids film adding in the secondary child’s imagination and showing what growing up is like through the lego pieces was interesting. Not the worst sequel ever, but not the greatest. 3 stars.

Only read the first sentence of ur reply, u seem to mbe looking for arguments wherever. I’m not here for that nonsense as I was really only stating facts. And by the way, Clark is a female so it was a gay relationship,lol.

The reality of this film is that the entire course of the relationship between Elizabeth the first and Mary Queen of Scots is that these two women never once met in person. Their entire relationship was done through letters and envoys, never in person even when granting Mary protection on English soil. Interesting film if you are interested in history and this period of time.

I get all of your points, I was only pointing out whyzero love interests does not typically exist in american television. I did say almost since their is an exception to every rule. I’m really only replying to clarify you saying Batwoman has to be gay on tv because thats the way she is written in the comic. I’m not 100 percent positive but the dc shows on CW have not always followed cannon, so they could have wrote the tv character any way they wanted to. I dont think most people really care one way or another it’s just when things are changed to appease certain groups of people. No one seemed to care when Clark had a girlfriend on The 100 as it fit with the character

If this was taken as purely a Bio-Pic then this film has dates and ages of when songs were released wrong, the actual relationship he had with his manager would also be wrong ( yes they were lovers, but his manager wasn’t some spend the cash greedy fuck all ) but taking it for what it is, a brief glimpse into what Elton John was willing to share with the world, it’s a wonderful film and gives a vague insight to a man who younger viewers know as the Lion King guy or the Candle in the Wind singer. Older viewers know the crazed mess that he was when he took off and skyrocketed to the top from a nobody backup performer to a star. Also bravo to Taron Egerton for the commanding performance both physically and vocally.

Simply put, because almost every successful show has some kind of love angle, even if it is only implied. Tends to give a series legs and an idea to play around with. Can’t really have a conflict with A Big Bad every episode without some filler or downtime.

I have at no time said anything harassing you, and only stated opinions and objective facts. Both characters are Batwoman and Katherine Kane, and originally she was a hetero circus performer. While you have demonized my personality in an attempt to gain some sort of upperhand in a nonexistent argument. You have been quite mean as a matter of fact and I am really confused as to why. I like the idea of Robin being gay so what, and I don’t think Batman is interested in a sexual relationship. That’s not so bad is it. I don’t see why this couldn’t have been a nice conversation without it breaking down into venomous name calling and assassination of my character.

That’s matter of perspective. And the quality of being a grey doesn’t mean you can’t have hetero relationships, I think think that might be the source of your anger at me, at least I hope. As a lesbian you should be more aware of that fact then most. Again this is only clarification as you seem quite intent on taking this as a personal attack, which it is not. Please stop the false accusations and name calling, it’s quite disturbing.

She seems grey to me.

That’s how you see it, cool, I respect your opinion, I wish you could respect mine without stooping to baseless accusations on my personality though. Fact Batwoman wasn’t always a lesbian that’s all I said. You want to make it out to be more than that I don’t know why, it doesn’t take away from the newer interpretation of the role, and for you to take it as a personal attack on yourself seems like an over reaction. I’m sorry if you feel condescended towards but my comment wasn’t aimed at you or the new show, it was just that a statement of fact about Katherine Kane’s history that you yourself have agreed to being a fact.

Okay you seem overly vested in trying to change what is in essence a personal opinion. I can’t seem to find an actual point to this except anger and confrontation fro you. And now you want it to be some sort of mansplaining defense on your part. Jody Foster is a great actor I like her version and it’s the one I identify with, you do her an injustice by saying she didn’t put anything into the role. An attack on my personality based on assumption does you a disservice as well, it comes off as disingenuous. I’m glad you are lesbian female, I’m also glad homosexuality is acceptable enough that shows like this can even happen. Using that as a soap box to skew perspective on me as some anti-feminist is insulting and a logical fallacy.

If that’s how you see it. But, if DC made her a lesbian they can unmake her a lesbian when it goes out of fashion. It comes off as disingenuous of DC to not distinguish the characters fully. And you can make the same argument about all DCU characters since the creation of the New 52. It’s a lazy attempt to grab viewers without developing true security in unconventional new characters.

I hardly think I am the only one who thinks that way, and the fact that there are other bad writers doesn’t in anyway make my thoughts on the matter invalid. The Julianne Moore interpretation was based on the movie in which Jody Foster starred due to the fact it didn’t follow the book. As for an agenda, I just think a role portrayed by a woman about a woman is better than one written by a misogynist about what he thinks a woman would do.

Is anyone else P.O’ed by the stereotype that a strong, independent fighting woman has to be gay? Why can’t we have a straight, strong, independent fighting woman? I am sick of the stereotype. The few times when we have an independent, straight, fighting woman, most of the time she has to be rescued still by a man. Show a straight woman who can handle herself in a fight. Break that stereotype. I’m not against gays. I’m against stereotyping that all strong, aggressive, fighting women have to be gay.

Clarice Sterling, that’s debatable, she seemed like a “Grey” sexual. She wouldn’t know what to do with feelings for anyone if she had them. Also they made the 2006 Batwoman gay, the original 1950’s one was not. She was actually created to squash rumors of Bruce Wayne and Dick Grayson being an item. Which just goes to show how producers will do anything to a character in order to get more viewers. Never understood how your going to have a relationship as a vigilante on that level anyway. It just ends up being camouflage for you crime fighting ways. What’s wrong with two guys who’s relationship goes beyond sex to a deeper love than any possible by normal people, or, not needing to be codependent on someone. They should of just let Robin be gay in the 50’s. Batwoman could of been another Clarice, what’s wrong with self sufficient women. Everyone is perfectly willing to let Bruce be a confirmed bachelor for life, but not Kate, what hypocritical nonsense.

My favorite thing about this series (if you’ve read the comics you would know this too) is that Number 5 is exactly how he reads. Best casting job ever made for a comic book turned film/show ever.