Clinton Cash (2016)
nowt 3 points 3 years ago*. (Contains Spoilers)

Stick with Harvard’s Berkman Klein Center’s ‘Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election’ [p. 118] for the relevant summary of why ‘Clinton Cash’ is more legerdemain farrago than anything: “Emails reveal that donors sought access, but Clinton aides refused them when they deemed the requests inappropriate.”

Also, rather brilliant visuals of the mediasphere in that report.