PrimeWire

What a crap verdict. He had nothing but a flippant response about the boots. No reasonable person could ignore the boots. They had his dna inside, were hidden at his worksite, had the victims blood on them, and left a print at the burial spot of the victim. If they had someone else’s dna in the boots they would have said that in court, they clearly didn’t. They presented no other possible explanation for the blood getting on the boots, nor why they were hidden his worksite. He also lied about his alibi, and never seemed to present a different one that could be corroborated. Its like having the defendant confess in court and then still ruling he’s not guilty, smh.