Everyone in this documentary is so dumb, my IQ dropped 20 points just from listening to them.
duuuuuuuuuude's comments
Allen v. Farrow (2021)
loveheart
1 points
3 years ago.
wow. you really have your ideas assbackwards
duuuuuuuuuude
2 points
3 years ago.
If she had 15 cats you’d call here a crazy cat lady and an animal hoarder.
Allen v. Farrow (2021)
snazzydetritus
0 points
3 years ago.
People who defend pedophiles are sick.sick, sick.
Whatever you say, QAnon. Do you believe the Earth is flat, too?
Allen v. Farrow (2021)
DaniBl
1 points
3 years ago.
So Angelina Jolie is a monster for adopting as many kids as she has? WTF…since when is wanting to adopt kids who have no home or any kind of future a bad thing? And, no, being with married men can in no way, shape or form compare to being a pedophile!
Yep. She clearly has mental issues. And any woman who gets pregnant by a married man has bad morals.
Allen v. Farrow (2021)
snazzydetritus
3 points
3 years ago.
I don’t think that could possibly have been an impartial investigation either. And investigations are botched constantly …not to mention the fact that if you check statistics, you will find that the system that is supposed to help,rescue and protect the children, fails them constantly. It’s been said that a child more or less has to die for the system to take any action. Why are you vehemently defending the schmuck, anyway? Are you a big fan?
Allen v. Farrow (2021)
DaniBl
3 points
3 years ago.
Please explain to me how would you react to being told your ex sexually abused your child AFTER already finding explicit nude pictures of your other daughter in his possession? If anything she was too nice. I would not let him within 50 feet of my children. Also, sadly, abused kids often react exactly how Dylan did, like they are not interested and like they are talking about an every day thing, because children have no concept of sexual abuse. He was clearly acting very strange with her for years and what happened that day probably felt normal to her on some level. Either way, it’s really strange that you choose to defend someone like him. He’s a creep which ever way you look at it.
duuuuuuuuuude
3 points
3 years ago.
Two separate investigations said he didn’t abuse her.
It’s really strange that you chose to defend an abusive mentally ill woman who not only married a man 30 years older than her, and not only got pregnant by a married man before she stole him away from his wife, but also adopted 15 children. Let that sink in… 15 children. What kind of person adopts 15 children… and then abuses them?
Allen v. Farrow (2021)
@duuuuuuuuuude I’m sure that clinic wasn’t in any way biased by the fact that they were investigating a rich, powerful, influential, well-loved celebrity. And just because her testimony was somewhat rehearsed (and, yeah, it probably was a bit influenced by Mia) doesn’t mean inappropriate things didn’t happen. Also, there’s so much incontrovertible evidence for his inappropriateness: his earlier relationship and grooming behavior with the Englehardt girl; his obsession with romantic relationships between underage females and men old enough to be their (old) fathers; the eyewitness testimony of most of the other children in the family and family friends….et al…
duuuuuuuuuude
2 points
3 years ago.
What about the second 14-month investigation by the New York State Department of Social Services that concluded “No credible evidence was found that [Dylan Farrow] has been abused or maltreated?”
Allen v. Farrow (2021)
DaniBl
7 points
3 years ago.
I’m not sure why you choose to believe Moses over what everyone else in that family is saying. I think Moses loved the attention Woody gave him and that’s the main reason he’s defending him. Even if nothing of what Dylan said happened, there are still so many witness accounts of his very strange and obsessive behaviour when it comes to her alone. And even if Mia “coached” her, Dylan is not a child anymore and by now she would cave in and say something about being coached.
Because they were brainwashed by a mentally ill, abusive mother who locked a paraplegic in a shed overnight. And the other nanny that was there said the lap incident didn’t happen.
“When Monica, our long-term nanny who was out that day, returned to work the next day, I confided to her that I thought the story was made up. Monica, who had been with us for six years, would quit her job a few months later, saying that Mia was pressuring her to take her side and support the accusation.
It was Monica who later testified that she saw Mia taping Dylan describe how Woody had supposedly touched her in the attic, saying it took Mia two or three days to make the recording. In her testimony she said, “I recall Ms. Farrow saying to Dylan at that time, ‘Dylan, what did daddy do… and what did he do next?’ Dylan appeared not to be interested, and Ms. Farrow would stop taping for a while and then continue.” I can vouch for this, having witnessed some of this process myself. When another one of Dylan’s therapists, Dr. Nancy Schultz, criticized the making of the video, and questioned the legitimacy of the content, she too, was fired immediately by Mia. (My mother, for whom ‘loyalt’ was hugely important, would also fire another long-term caretaker, Mavis, claiming that she was making statements against her.)”
Allen v. Farrow (2021)
CodeBlack
-1 points
3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)
Doesn’t matter what he says I don’t believe anything but the facts and the facts are he touched a little girl. He def part of Hollyweird pedophile ring and there nothing you can say that will make what he did okay. Did you even listen to the phone calls, Woody is def a suspect, sick dude
The fact is that it was investigated thoroughly for 6 months by the Child Sexual Abuse Clinic of the Yale/New Haven Hospital and not did they conclude “Dylan was not abused by Mr. Allen,” they also concluded that Dylan’s testimony had a “rehearsed quality” and that they were “likely coached or influenced by her mother.”
Allen v. Farrow (2021)
Even if what you’re saying is true, and I don’t believe it is, that still doesn’t explain what happened with him and Soon Yi. You have to be sick in the head to have sexual relations with your girlfriend’s daughter…daughter you’ve pretty much seen grow up.
duuuuuuuuuude
1 points
3 years ago.
It’s not what I say, it’s what Moses Farrow says. He’s an eye witness.
And Woody Allen had zero contact with Soon Yi when she was growing up.
Also, the documentary conveniently leaves out that Mia Farrow was 19 and Frank Sinatra was 50 when they started dating. That’s just about the same as Woody and Soon Yi.
Allen v. Farrow (2021)
snazzydetritus
5 points
3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)
Read it. Still convinced that he had an inappropriate relationship with his small child and that he is a bona fide POS. But I will add that I think Mia may have had good intentions at first, but she is awful also. And if anyone thinks Ronan is Woody’s biological child, all they have to do is compare a photo of him and Frank Sinatra to discover where his DNA originates.
duuuuuuuuuude
1 points
3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)
She mentally abused those kids and spent days coercing Dylan to make that video.
Allen v. Farrow (2021)
duuuuuuuuuude
0 points
3 years ago.
Before you believe everything in this documentary, you should read what Moses Farrow has to say. Google “A SON SPEAKS OUT By Moses Farrow”
American Honey (2016)
duuuuuuuuuude
3 points
3 years ago.
You know why Shia LaBeouf plays the same unlikable, mentally ill, d-bag in every film? Because he’s an unlikable, mentally ill, d-bag in real life.
While the Rest of Us Die (2020)
Kungflu
7 points
3 years ago.
This had so much potential, the subject matter is incredibly interesting. But what we get is a Republican hit piece. The first episode was okay until the final third turned into a Trump hit-piece. Which isn’t unusual in this day and age, but is out of place here. Then the entire second episode is basically a condemnation of the younger Bush. Had they simply concentrated on the factual aspects, this could have been enjoyable.
Bottom line, if you hate conservatives, watch this. If you’re looking for what the description of the series says, don’t waste your time.
duuuuuuuuuude
0 points
3 years ago.
It’s not even a republican hit piece. It’s just millennial economic conspiracy theories.
While the Rest of Us Die (2020) S1 E5
duuuuuuuuuude
-3 points
3 years ago.
This must have been written by a bunch of millennial. It’s not how the world really works.
We Are Who We Are (2020)
My prediction is that the black Muslim kid is going to murder Chloë Sevigny.
The Trial of the Chicago 7 (2020)
I give it three stars because Sacha Baron Cohen isn’t the right actor to play Abbie Hoffman. Hoffman was 5’8” and much less brooding. He was a fun and jester like guy who was always laughing at the cosmic joke in everything. Sacha Baron Cohen didn’t capture Abbie’s character at all.
Abstract: The Art of Design (2017) S1 E6
Understand just fine that something’s sadly awry regarding some ppl’s understanding of design, of work on design, of credit for design [quotes, logistics, and all]; just DSM-V sickly ‘off’ concerning the fact that 2+2 [design] even when in the mind, is still 4 [design]; still—
Take it up with either Scher, Huyssen, or both. Scher even teaches this stuff, and they’re -both- professionals [of rather different degree by now], so likely won’t mock an ailing person in fits of dismayed pity on a public forum for any mental inadequacy. They are themselves ‘safe spaces’.
Good luck!
duuuuuuuuuude
-1 points
3 years ago.
Seriously, what is your problem. I proved you wrong four times. The facts are the facts. Just admit you’re wrong and get on with you life.
Abstract: The Art of Design (2017) S1 E6
Understand just fine that something’s sadly awry regarding some ppl’s understanding of design, of work on design, of credit for design [quotes, logistics, and all]; just DSM-V sickly ‘off’ concerning the fact that 2+2 [design] even when in the mind, is still 4 [design]; still—
Take it up with either Scher, Huyssen, or both. Scher even teaches this stuff, and they’re -both- professionals [of rather different degree by now], so likely won’t mock an ailing person in fits of dismayed pity on a public forum for any mental inadequacy. They are themselves ‘safe spaces’.
Good luck!
duuuuuuuuuude
-1 points
3 years ago.
Seriously, what is your problem. I proved you wrong four times. The facts are the facts. Just admit you’re wrong and get on with you life.
Abstract: The Art of Design (2017) S1 E6
nowt
2 points
3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)
Yeah, her original idea. They then worked on a new one, which she still hates, and despite its success, which she doesn’t rest upon the laurels of, being an actual Einstein-type genius concerning things like typography and -graphic design-. Roger, tho…
Designs [in the mind] aren’t designs, huh.
Alrighty, then.
Maybe contact Scher directly for clarification. Even an intern could prolly set ya straight.
info@pentagram dot com
newyork@pentagram dot com
Dude, I’ve proved your wrong four times. Let it go. The sketches are online for everyone to see. They’re his, not hers. Why are you so stubborn? Just admit you’re wrong.
Abstract: The Art of Design (2017) S1 E6
…
So, Scher and Scholz talk about the idea, and agree on a design…
Scher then tells her illustrator what the design idea is, and he sketches it out with her over his shoulder as she tells him what to do/not do, giving direction as head of a vcreative department working on that month’s big project, making certain that Roger doesn’t get wrong what Scholz and Scher talked about…
Scher then gets credit for filling out -by designing- the idea Scholz had on the album, -on the album-…
Hussyen gets credit for illustrating the idea Scholz had that then was designed and relayed to him by his boss at the time, on that same album, where he’s credited -not as designer- but as illustrator…
But for you to believe otherwise, it’s more than a feeling?
Cool.
duuuuuuuuuude
0 points
3 years ago.
A concept inside someone’s head isn’t a design, Einstein. In the documentary she said her idea got rejected by Scholz.
Abstract: The Art of Design (2017) S1 E6
Yeah, OK. Guess who was Art Director at CBS Records in 1976? She wasn’t ‘only doing’ typography. She was in control of the show and she didn’t get to the point of control of designs there by -not- designing things. Dude.
Guess who worked for CBS Records in 1976 as a sketch monkey? Take your time. It’s a tough one.
But nice to see you move from ‘Roger illustrated it, not her’ which is such a strange red herring [no, really? just like it says in the cover credits? where she -only- designed the infernal thing [boston agrees! ON THE COVER! [scholz the one who -wanted- ‘guitar spaceships’]]], to ‘Roger did everything [design, illustration, idea], but design the typography’.
Creepy. And now I know way too much about a yacht rock album.
Gross on so many levels.
duuuuuuuuuude
-1 points
3 years ago.
Art Directing isn’t designing, Einstein. Roger Huyssen has his preliminary sketches online. You can clearly see the entire layout was his design.
Abstract: The Art of Design (2017) S1 E6
…
For designing it. In a design show. She even jokes about having -designed- it by saying that designing it will be what memorializes her.
Know who else gave her credit for designing it? Boston. On the back of that album cover. For design.
But hey! As long you’re so vconcerned about ppl giving proper credit, let’s see what Huyssen says about it on his own business page on FB, circa August, 2019—
Boston. Designed and created this in 1976 for Columbia (Epic)Records. Very little time to paint. Only direction was it had to have a guitar in it. Not my best but by far my most famous.
What a guy. Drop him a line! Roger@Huyssen dot com
Abstract: The Art of Design (2017) S1 E6
nowt
2 points
3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)
The Boston cover is dumb.
I am still mystified by how something
like that really resonates in culture.
I mean, it predated Star Wars.
So we must have hit a zeitgeist
that was about to happen.
But when I die, it will say,
“Designed the Boston cover,”
and I’ve lived
with this horror ever since,
and I think it may wind up being true.
—Paula Scher | Abstract: The Art of Design S01E06
Huyssen’s aware who designed it; Scher’s aware who illustrated it.
duuuuuuuuuude
-1 points
3 years ago.
She takes credit for it in this video. She doesn’t even mention Huyssen.
Social Distance (2020)
I flipped though the first 4 episodes. Are any of these stories about straight white people?
Abstract: The Art of Design (2017) S1 E5
duuuuuuuuuude
0 points
3 years ago.
Who the F thinks of Chrysler’s designers as “taste makers?” They’re old man cars.
Bad President (2021)
ObserverMI
2 points
3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)
Do you see all the boat parades, the car parades even in CA and other Dem run states? See all the hats and signs and huge overflowing crowds for Trump when Biden can barely fill a Starbucks?
The excitement rate for Trump is very visible. It’s not ‘anti-Biden’ it’s Pro Trump.
Trump won the first time because he wasn’t your typical politician. He wanted to blow up the norm. Yes, there were some that voted against Hillary for many reasons yet, mostly for Trump.
The evidence is pretty clear then and especially now.
duuuuuuuuuude
-2 points
3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)
People were excited for comrade Bernie, too. And he lost by 6,000,000 votes.
Bad President (2021)
SheWatches
5 points
3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)
People didn’t vote for Trump, they voted AGAINST Hillary. Even though the Obama’s did their duty in supporting the democratic nominee, they hated Hillary too. and THAT’s what really happened.
duuuuuuuuuude
5 points
3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)
3,000,000 more people voted for Hillary. And THAT’s what really happened.
Bad President (2021)
I am not denying trump’s locker room banter, or sexualizing of women…and I certainly not condoning it. He apologized for it during Clinton debate nationally on television didn’t he. Let me know of a man who hasn’t done the same, and yet few will apologize. Popcorn joe has been filmed doing it , and with children. Why is he above the law? And Pelosi is crazy obviously along with Biden to encourage and embolden jihadists, antifa, blm, defunding police, burning of cities and destroying citizens livelihoods. So much for the process of law, and protecting your constituents. Killary and Benghazi affair, Biden releasing names of Osama seal team 6 kill team which were assassinated. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/09/never-forget-families-blame-loose-lips-joe-biden-taliban-slaughters-16-members-seal-team-6-afghanistan-video/ And as far Trump killing people, I assume you are referencing this plandemic fiasco that has killed more people via suicides, waiting for medical surgeries, or simply incompetence. Both CDC and WHO released info indicating covid cases were at least 50% overestimated (which means its even less) and it is no worse than the seasonal flu…a coronavirus is a flu. So the global economy was destroyed for a flu. And any scientist worth his sale would have realized that when the cruiseliner off of Japan was quarantined for 3 months with only 3 deaths from 3700..that’s .0008%, or 1000th of a percent. Further Trump shut down airlines in March, while Pelosi was cooing Chinatown, and denying the virus. Dems now are planning a super legislature by loading Supreme Court with Dem judges. And the recent release of Hillary emails confirms she kept defense intel on a private server that can be easily hacked. Now either popcorn, and killary (who from last count has had 57 friends suicided) are the most incompetent pieces of human scorn in USA, or they know exactly what they are doing, and anyone in their way will pay. Either wake up or get out of the way, and let the big boys get on with business, but please don’t patronize me with this nonsense. Critic the film ..horns on Potus?? Any devil would be murdering babies post-birth..oh right that’s the Dems kill team.
Did he apologize to his wife for cheating her sans condom with a pornstar while she was pregnant with his son? Let me know of a man who’s done the same.
Bad President (2021)
Franco
4 points
3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)
Some elements of the Electoral College, such as the indirect vote through intermediaries, were hotly debated at the 1787 Constitutional Convention. It was eventually justified in part as a stopgap to potentially reverse the vote if the people elected a criminal, traitor, or similar kind of heinous person. The Founders wanted to empower democratic elements in the American system, but they feared a kind of pure, unrestrained democracy that had brought down great republics of the past. It is a means of protection from a Killary, Gropin’ Uncle Joe, or a Crazy Pelosi. Infanticide touting dems would even make the Almighty blush in revulsion, if HE wasn’t omniscient.This is more MSM trash. Time to bring on the unredacted Brennan notes on Hillary/Obama Russia hoax, and the server emails. Take down the whole rotten house, and bring back the republic. Scum the whole lot of them !!
duuuuuuuuuude
-2 points
3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)
Infanticide is fun. I’ve had 4 abortions. God bless America. The land of the free, the home of the brave.
Bad President (2021)
ramfat
4 points
3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)
How did Trump become President? Easy…..his opponent was Hillary Clinton. The End.
American Murder: The Family Next Door (2020)
Julianna
8 points
3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)
I am not stunned often but reading what was posted above rendered me that way instantly. How could you? WTF is wrong with you to make you say such a terrible thing of this beautiful young mother who was so horrifically murdered by someone she loved and trusted along with her precious babies? She seemed a horrible wife? Seriously, WTF
duuuuuuuuuude
-1 points
3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)
Because she berated him constantly. There’s footage of her doing it.
American Murder: The Family Next Door (2020)
duuuuuuuuuude
-7 points
3 years ago.
Not saying she deserved to get murdered, but she seemed life a horrible wife.
The Walking Dead: World Beyond (2020)
duuuuuuuuuude
4 points
3 years ago.
Apparently you can still get a weave and pluck your eyebrows in the middle of a zombie apocyclops.
We Are Who We Are (2020)
duuuuuuuuuude
4 points
3 years ago.
Am I supposed to like this kid? He’s an entitled little D bag who steals and hits his mother.
What Is Democracy? (2019)
duuuuuuuuuude
1 points
3 years ago.
This documentary was made by a self avowed socialist. So it’s a very very biased documentary.
Boys State (2020)
Yes! You got it! Positive Energy!