Allen v. Farrow (2021)
DaniBl 7 points 3 years ago.

I’m not sure why you choose to believe Moses over what everyone else in that family is saying. I think Moses loved the attention Woody gave him and that’s the main reason he’s defending him. Even if nothing of what Dylan said happened, there are still so many witness accounts of his very strange and obsessive behaviour when it comes to her alone. And even if Mia “coached” her, Dylan is not a child anymore and by now she would cave in and say something about being coached.

duuuuuuuuuude -2 points 3 years ago*.

Because they were brainwashed by a mentally ill, abusive mother who locked a paraplegic in a shed overnight. And the other nanny that was there said the lap incident didn’t happen.

“When Monica, our long-term nanny who was out that day, returned to work the next day, I confided to her that I thought the story was made up. Monica, who had been with us for six years, would quit her job a few months later, saying that Mia was pressuring her to take her side and support the accusation.

It was Monica who later testified that she saw Mia taping Dylan describe how Woody had supposedly touched her in the attic, saying it took Mia two or three days to make the recording. In her testimony she said, “I recall Ms. Farrow saying to Dylan at that time, ‘Dylan, what did daddy do… and what did he do next?’ Dylan appeared not to be interested, and Ms. Farrow would stop taping for a while and then continue.” I can vouch for this, having witnessed some of this process myself. When another one of Dylan’s therapists, Dr. Nancy Schultz, criticized the making of the video, and questioned the legitimacy of the content, she too, was fired immediately by Mia. (My mother, for whom ‘loyalt’ was hugely important, would also fire another long-term caretaker, Mavis, claiming that she was making statements against her.)”