somniloquist's comments

The Vow (2020)
Jirido -9 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

I think it’s cool. Norm life is sooo fucked up. Just mention the price of over consumption in the world as an example.. animal industry, undisciplined sloppy self indulgent people e.t.c. Keith and his branding is cheesy for sure but WTF.. Any one that want to can leave with some effort if they not to stupid (in witch case they must learn)and I mean how easy is it to get some fairly safe corny action in life.. Really?? Some branding is not a high price and they girls don’t seem to suffer to badly over the wine and their dinners. I’m sure I’m a bad person but it has been proven over and over again that people prefer even pain over boredom. And be honest here.. is it not what this all is about.. boredom of a rich spoiled nation? And some kink to get the little slot wet for a change.. the normal search for some responsible parents instead of a meeting with death and the true loneliness of life in a body.

somniloquist 13 points 3 years ago*.

Denying someone food, sleep, and social contact is not ‘kink.’ Systematically diminishing someone’s capacity to function in the above ways is no different than drugging someone. Consent is not legally possible at that point. It doesn’t matter the socio-economic standing of the victims, this is nothing other than criminally predatory behavior.

Feels Good Man (2020)
somniloquist 5 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

This is basically a guided tour of “why we can’t have nice things.” How Matt Furie is still so kind and understanding after having his art taken and twisted by these monsters, I’ll never understand.

Cuties (2020)
somniloquist 8 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

Disclaimer: I actually watched this movie. Yes, the whole thing.

Cuties is the story of girls who are going to be women. Sometimes they look forward to this passage, sometimes they dread it. The problem lies in the fact that they don’t know what being a woman means. They don’t understand sex, consent, sexuality. One is mocked for picking up a discarded condom thinking it to be a balloon. They don’t understand the media being fed to them, neither mass nor social. They certainly don’t grasp its permanency or influence over them.
These girls glean information from the women in their lives, but gain little direction. The central character deals with her father traveling back to his native Senegal and returning with a second wife who will supplant the position of her own mother in the family. She’s left alone with her feelings. She doesn’t know how to handle sorrow, betrayal, anger. She lashes out. The same sorts of episodes are played out with her sexuality. People will complain about the dancing, but it’s very clearly the fumbling of young girls who don’t understand what they’re doing, they just understand that when women move that way everyone pays them attention.
If you choose not to take any time to try and understand what these young women are going through, you’re betraying them in all the ways that led to the predicaments they find themselves in in the film. If you choose to watch ‘coming of age’ stories featuring young boys figuring out their sexuality, and find pathos or even humor in it, and then don’t afford the same to these girls, you’re part of the problem. If you can watch upper middle class white girls on Dance Moms and Tik Tok do these same moves and you don’t have the same ‘outrage’ towards them that you may express towards these girls, you need to take a long hard look at why.
This film was beautifully made and will surely stand as a lasting, if controversial, testament to what pubescent girls the world over experience and endure on a daily basis. Maïmouna Doucouré has bravely told a story with Cuties that may be hard to watch at times, but I guarantee you, it’s much harder to live.

Stay Woke: The Black Lives Matter Movement (2016)
Infinitystar 8 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

And I will say this again as I have on other comment sections. THE Mods need to stop taking sides and keep this a comment on the movie/show only.
I come here to find out how the show is not to read lectures on the opinions of the right or the left!!! And not one comment here is anything but a right/left fight.

somniloquist 6 points 3 years ago.

Pretty sure that’s why there’s a reviews section versus a discussion section. You, my friend, are looking at a discussion.

Stay Woke: The Black Lives Matter Movement (2016)
SLEEPEYE 6 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

you should all move to england where most of us dont see colour.

somniloquist 4 points 3 years ago.

Don’t big-up yourselves until you manage to get rid of UKIP.

Gaga for Dada: The Original Art Rebels (2016)
somniloquist 2 points 3 years ago*. (Contains Spoilers)

Absurd times call for absurd measures. Lunatic genius Scotsman Martin Creed knows that so well. Mony a mickle maks a muckle, but tha’s nowt ta do wi me ya see.

Simon Schama's Power of Art (2006) S1 E6
somniloquist 2 points 3 years ago*. (Contains Spoilers)

Watch Andy Serkis eat paint. Seriously. Do it.

Louis Theroux: A Place for Paedophiles (2009)
somniloquist 2 points 3 years ago*. (Contains Spoilers)

Can someone be held indefinitely by the state against the potential of them repeating an offence for which they have already served their sentenced time?
Louis Theroux tackles yet another very difficult subject, pedophiles that have served their time and yet are still deemed to be a threat to society. He visits a “hospital” that is full of men who have been convicted, completed a sentence, and then essentially re-incarcerated in a warehousing situation. This raises crushingly difficult issues surrounding rehabilitation, the prison system, mental health, and thought crime. Hear first hand from the men themselves regarding whether they agree to participate in treatment or not, and the merit such a process may or may not hold.
This review may or may not be a thinly veiled commentary on extending ‘punishments’ indefinitely.

The Alienist (2018)
somniloquist 2 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

The best part about the second season of the Alienist is its lack of the alienist. These kinds of shows perplex me, going to all of these efforts and great cost to recreate conditions of the past and then using terms like “serial killer” about three quarters of a century early. The worst offending character is the titular man himself. This continues quite past the point of irritation, making the character act like he’s written for a decade other than the one in which the others seem to exist. Luckily, they quash this in the first series, though it is allowed to go on far too long.

Petey Wheatstraw (1977)
somniloquist 2 points 3 years ago*. (Contains Spoilers)

So you watched Dolemite Is My Name with Eddie Murphy and loved it, right? The man Murphy played was real. Rudy Ray Moore made some hilarious movies, full of biting satire, absurd comedy, and the highest level of Blaxploitation style. You’ve seen it recreated, co-opted, and updated, now watch the real thing.
Blaxploitation cred includes: Kung Fu fights for no good reason, a man with Al Sharpton’s OLD hair, the director’s astrological sign listed in the opening credits (he’s a Libra, ya’ll), and Lucifer himself wearing an over-sized marigold velvet bowtie.
Quentin Tarantino has spent his entire life WISHING he was this cool.

The Six Degrees of Helter Skelter (2009)
somniloquist 2 points 3 years ago*. (Contains Spoilers)

No real life experience exists in a vacuum, most especially a crime, most especially in Hollywood. Scott Michaels knows his stuff and does the legwork. This documentary not only shows the Manson Family murders, but all the connections (and the connections to those connections) that spread like a web through southern California. Michaels covers petty criminals, super stars, musicians, producers, directors, actors, and everyone else who got caught in this web. Really astounding work.
“It’s history to me, and somebody’s got to save it. Even though I look like an idiot.”
The only work on the Manson case that I’ve seen come anywhere near this comprehensive in recent years was the 10-part podcast series done by You Must Remember This. And this doc is less then two hours, so watch it.

Beverly Hills Cop (1984)
somniloquist 4 points 3 years ago.

“It’s serious because it’s VARY IMPARTANT PEECE.”

Very Scary People (2019) S2 E7
magically_delicious 3 points 3 years ago*. (Contains Spoilers)

Edmund Kemper. This man was/is 6’9” of high IQ serial killer. He turned himself in, believe it or not. Look him up. He is impressive in every sense. Anyone, anyone, would be a mere twig in his hands… and his crimes, his brutal crimes of dismemberment, sex with dismembered corpses, killing his mum and putting her vocal cords in the kitchen disposal to grind them up…etc. are some of the most (if not THE most) horrific, ever. To willingly turn himself in shows something so baffling for someone like him. His mother sounded like a true monster, but the women he killed must have been completely helpless and utterly terrified. The voice you hear on this episode is Edmund Kemper. Bone chilling.

somniloquist 1 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

And then in prison he recorded hundreds of books for the blind. For decades people have been listening to this man read aloud and never knew he decapitated his mother.

The Hudsucker Proxy (1994)
nowt 3 points 3 years ago*. (Contains Spoilers)

Newman so proxemically sly.

somniloquist 4 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

You know, for kids.

Mary Beard's Shock of the Nude (2020)
somniloquist 4 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

Mary Beard manages, in two short hours, to present a program encompassing art history, feminism, gender, the male gaze, the early quest for anatomical knowledge, censorship, human sexuality, museum ethics, and the politics of aging. She uses pieces of art from the ancient world through to contemporary works. She even talks to Marc Quinn. All of this leads me to ask, can Mary Beard see inside my brain? Possibly. Very possibly.

Symbiopsychotaxiplasm: Take 2 1/2 (2006)
somniloquist 3 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

Filmmakers filming filmmakers making films. Actors talking about actors acting like they’re acting. Artifice on top of reality on top of artifice on top of reality. On top of artifice?

Evil Toons (1993)
somniloquist 2 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

Pro tip: If you’re writing a book about demons and a page includes both an incantation to release one of these demons AND a warning to never ever read that incantation, put the warning first. Seriously, top of the page. Think of the coeds.

Goddo supiido yuu! Burakku emparaa (1976)
somniloquist 1 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

Lift your skinny fists like antennas to heaven.

Near Dark (1988)
nowt 0 points 3 years ago*. (Contains Spoilers)

[deleted]

somniloquist 2 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

By a spur? By a leather jacket more like. Damn, Paxton. Daaamn.

Super Mario Bros. (1993)
somniloquist 4 points 3 years ago*. (Contains Spoilers)

Do you remember that part of the video game in which the former king is ‘de-evolved’ into a sentient fungus that can catch a stolen police car as it drives over a cliff and dangle it in the air like a bungee jumper? Yeah, me neither.
But I do feel like Chuck Tingle’s writing has really improved since 1993. Too bad Dennis Hopper didn’t live to see his renaissance.

You Don't Nomi (2020)
somniloquist 3 points 3 years ago*. (Contains Spoilers)

“What I love about that scene is that it’s like it was written by a brain dead Harold Pinter. The subtext is stunning, until you realize there is no subtext.”
—-Adam Nayman

Paris Is Burning (1990)
somniloquist 3 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

If you’re watching Legendary, RuPaul’s Drag Race, or Pose and you haven’t seen Paris is Burning, what are you doing? This is a vital primer in drag, ballroom, vogue, gay lives of color, trans lives of color, and a big part of the NYC underground from the late 70s through the mid 90s. Do your homework.

The State (1994)
somniloquist 4 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

The State is truly seminal to comedy of the last 25 years. Not only is the show itself really really good, but members of the State (in various combinations) went on to create Reno 911, Stella, Wet Hot American Summer, Viva Variety, Michael and Michael Have Issues, and Children’s Hospital. Members of the State have been on, basically, every comedy show you’ve loved in the past two decades…Always Sunny, Bob’s Burgers, Drunk History, Archer, Veep, Party Down, Another Period, Burning Love, and on and on and on.

The Computer Wore Tennis Shoes (1969)
xerox 1 points 3 years ago*.

Yes but the film itself is the layering of singular images , composite framing creating the perception of movement by the projection and denial of light. I am unsure if film about a human being as computer who was only able to recite base information had perception other than recognising its existence, while the non-genius boys in most primal being sought to find beauty of some kind, neither finding the value though they themselves are captured and rendered by the thing that creates the medium they exist in ( a past passage of time captured) . But Im big on visual poetry of it all. Given that it is disney film and it was more so at time littered with artistic persons I believe it may have been a deliberate choice. But I’m likely wrong.

somniloquist 2 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

You’ve stepped back too far then. I’m talking about these students looking at that painting. You’re talking about a viewer of a film looking at these students looking at that painting. In the (fictional yet plausible) context of the film, these are actual people looking at an actual painting. And that painting was done in 1912, in oil, on canvas. You can’t impose the medium of film atop a painting in a film. You can only impose the meaning of film onto the film itself.

The Computer Wore Tennis Shoes (1969)
xerox 2 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

Okay, very valid point. In the movie after the quiz which they won they talked about his art, stating that they didn’t see the nudity and felt sorry for him , I personally did not agree with the movies sentiment over the art works featured in the film. Did you?

somniloquist 2 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

I suppose I would say (without getting too far into it) to the students in this film (which I have never seen) that looking for nudity, looking for the human form at all, in that painting is missing the point almost entirely. I would say that Nude Descending a Staircase No. 2 (which I would assume is the version they were looking at) chiefly holds the purpose of capturing movement, secondarily how light would play a roll in perceiving that movement, and thirdly perhaps the passage of time in a still image. This is what Duchamp was exploring by even working in the cubist genre at all. I would say that those students, or any students, ought to mentally and conceptually back up from the work and forget about trying to compare it with ‘real world’ physical space.

The Computer Wore Tennis Shoes (1969)
xerox 2 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

Cool stuff, what did you write about?
I am not entirely sure I consider him an artist in visual medium but rather a poet who couldn’t write and opted to use physicality. Which was nice.

somniloquist 2 points 3 years ago*. (Contains Spoilers)

Here’s one of those pitfalls coming up, buddy. Gotta stay on the topic of the movie.

Animator (2018)
xerox 0 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

I was muted for 14 hours or so, which in truth could easily be fixed by adding a word limit to reviews, I think in truth the subject matter might have held some value to the moderator and that is why I was asked to delete / shorten it. But I’d prefer to think there was a unwritten word limit given that is the reason I was given.

somniloquist 1 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

Most rules around here you don’t know about until you manage to break them. They’re not listed anywhere, so you find out the wrong way every time. Just kinda stumble around finding out things are hot by burning your hand. Let’s be kind and call it…frustrating.

The Computer Wore Tennis Shoes (1969)
xerox 2 points 3 years ago*.

The artist and his works, actually three, bride, chess players and nude descending staircase, the latter of which several cast members briefly discuss.Oh only clicked expand spoilers, wasn’t aware prior. A fan of modern art eh? cool you. personally I think some of his works are rather beautiful sperm love letter, barnyard murder etc.

somniloquist 3 points 3 years ago.

I may or may not have done a fair amount of academic work on the man.

The Computer Wore Tennis Shoes (1969)
somniloquist 3 points 3 years ago.

Whoa whoa whoa WHOA. Which Duchamp?

somniloquist 2 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

Goddammit Disney…
“Gentlemen, these are the works of the famous Marcel Duchamp as found in the collection of the Philadelphia Museum of Art.” The dialogue then goes on to name Portrait of Chess Players, A Nude Descending a Staircase, and The Bride.
So, presumably standing in the middle of the Dreier and Arensberg collections, they’ve chosen to name check an early cubist piece, The Nude called by the wrong title (also cubist), and a cubist preparatory painting for effing masterwork that would have been standing in the center of that same room? What?!
In the middle of the PMA and we’re just ignoring the Large Glass, the Bicycle Wheel, and the Étant donnés?! Just that last work takes up an entire room. I’m gonna go breathe into a paper bag…

The Computer Wore Tennis Shoes (1969)
xerox 4 points 3 years ago.

Highly enjoyable, innocent fun with a nice moral narrative, the style is dated, the effects are hilariously dated to say the least but it only adds to the charm. #
The cast staring ‘snake’ Russel is a cherubed faced teen here far from his high kicking, skull smashing later stardom . 4/5

S.N. It was nice to see some Duchamp art in a Disney film.

somniloquist 3 points 3 years ago.

Whoa whoa whoa WHOA. Which Duchamp?

The Very Excellent Mr. Dundee (2020)
kingarco66 1 points 3 years ago.

no you cant be .. youre a paul hogan fan

somniloquist 3 points 3 years ago.

Fair dinkum.

Lynch (2007)
somniloquist 3 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

Watch Lynch talk about transcendental meditation, Polish factories, and that one time he spent a half an hour trying to “pop” a dead and bloated cow with a pick axe. Watch him smear paint on the floor, make a tiny model of a bison, and cut some holes in the wall. Watch David Lynch smoke. A lot.

Tucker Carlson Tonight (2016) S2020 E143
xerox 3 points 3 years ago*. (Contains Spoilers)

Ok, first never seen this show before, I’m not american so this type of ‘news-entertainment’ is weird thing.

Is this news or is this not news, I realise news is largely no longer objective but still, guy needs to talk less.

Bland tanned man with quaffed hair and the brow of a chimp stares in seeming faux perplexed constipation.

Segments really seem to drag on with the casual banter, talking to me ( the viewer ) like were friends is just kinda tacky, weird rich dude stop chatting to me in that condescending way.

Is his hair real? He needs a moustache.

The never ending waving neon coloured flag and banner at the bottom of the screen are irritating. I do not need to know what channel this is on, nor which nation it comes from and I can hear what you are saying you do not need to write it down also. Waste so much of the screen.

2/5 meh not really funny and the information seemed its faster to digest a paper format in the time it took to watch that.

somniloquist 2 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

My bid for the “best part” of this show was the testimony by a Fox network lawyer during Mr. Carlson’s slander suit last month. In the court filing, Tucker Carlson Tonight was referred to as “hyperbolic opinion commentary” and not “sober factual reporting.” When the judge asked Fox’s attorneys “Does Mr. Carlson’s position have a duty of inquiry?” (i.e. does Tucks have an obligation to research and factual reporting) the answer was “no.”

The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai Across the 8th Dimension (1984)
nowt 2 points 3 years ago*. (Contains Spoilers)

Looking at World Watch One’s April, 1986 newsletter. Can now tie a bowtie.

somniloquist 1 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

It mustn’t be too perfect or it’ll look pretied.

The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai Across the 8th Dimension (1984)
nowt 1 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

[places watermelon here]

somniloquist 1 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

I’m holding out for the shatter-proof whole-wheat taco shells.

Blood Vessel (2020)
kingarco66 7 points 3 years ago.

Everything i wanted in a film! Is it my birthday?

somniloquist 5 points 3 years ago*.

Remind me to steer well clear of your next birthday party.

Voyage to the Planet of Prehistoric Women (1968)
Saucer-People 1 points 3 years ago.

What’s hilarious about this film is the fact that Roger Corman ‘unofficially’ appropriates large chunks of the 1962 Soviet Sci-fi classic ‘Planeta Bur’ or Planet of the Storms, directed by Pavel Klushantsev!
If you get through this, I highly recommend you track down the original Russian film which is a triumph of storyline and visual technique.

somniloquist 2 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

I think this is the one where AIP didn’t give Corman enough budget to record sound on location, so all of the women were rewritten as telepathic. They filmed a lot of ‘knowing looks’ and figured it all out in post.

The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai Across the 8th Dimension (1984)
somniloquist 2 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

I sure hope John Lithgow got paid time and a half for this, ‘cause that man was acting overtime. A hunched stance, the most absurd accent, buggy eyes, crazy hair, and teeth that are (somehow) villainous. Even the teeth! Heck, watch it on mute just for his facial expressions and it’s still worth your time.
Where are we going?
Planet Ten.
When?
REAL SOON.

Pinocchio (1940)
somniloquist 3 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

Jiminy Cricket says “Go ahead, make a fool of yourself. Maybe then you’ll listen to your conscience.”
A boy who has always been real, despite his wooden parts, dances in the way he wants to dance. There are no strings on him.
“Gosh,” says Cricket, “They like him. He’s a success.”
And to think, all the other boys were turned into jackasses.

Ghostwatch (1992)
KungFlu -1 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

Manning wasnt a presenter on this. I watched it as a kid and it was Sarah Greene who was attacked and dragged in a cupboard and Michael Parkinson who was possessed at the end. Parkinson gave it credibility to kids like me at the time. With no Facebook or Twitter at the time nobody knew if it were real or not. Scared the fuck out of me and it was years befor I went near our boarding houses cupboard lmao

somniloquist 2 points 3 years ago*. (Contains Spoilers)

It was Sarah Green! I remembered it wrong and stand corrected. See? British people of a certain age, it messed your brains up. I have yet to meet someone that wasn’t screwed up by Ghostwatch.

Manning must’ve directed it, and I think caught some real flack off of it.

Ghostwatch (1992)
somniloquist 5 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

After its initial airing, Ghostwatch was banned from being broadcast on the BBC for ten years. What was supposed to be a bit of a Halloween prank ended up with 30,000 calls to the BBC switchboard in an hour. In an ill-fated attempt to straddle fiction and documentary, the network failed to properly warn the viewing audience that what they were watching was definitely not real. Cut to thousands of British children watching a beloved kids’ TV presenter, Lesley Manning, being possessed by a ghost called Pipes.
In the wake of Ghostwatch an intellectually challenged young man killed himself after the pipes in his house began to knock like those in the show. There was even a medical journal report, with dubious validity, about kids showing symptoms of PTSD after watching the program.
Viewing Ghostwatch now you could never fully grasp the effect it had on a nation. It would look hokey and stupid. But before all of our minds were trained, by reality television and social media, to watch with a more skeptical eye, stuff like this could really do some damage. (Go find a British person between their mid 30s and mid 40s. Ask them about Pipes.)

Legend (1985)
somniloquist 4 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

Lily didn’t listen and now the world is dying and she might have to marry Satan. So the next time your Forest Folk (boy)friend tells you not to touch something, maybe don’t touch it. Okay?

Cool World (1992)
somniloquist 3 points 3 years ago*. (Contains Spoilers)

Brad Pitt comes home from WWII and he’s killed in a crash with his mother in the 1940s. He ends up in an animated world. This is never explained. Gabriel Byrne is an animator in the 1990s, in prison (for killing his wife?) and he’s continuing to animate in prison. This is never explained. Minutes later Pitt is now a policeman in the animated world, and he’s gone from not know what’s going on to knowing everything and all the rules. This is never explained. Kim Basinger is an animation drawn by Byrne who wants to be ‘real.’ She can pull Byrne into the animated world. This is never explained. By seducing Byrne and having sex with him, Basinger is now a live action character. But she’s unstable and turning back into a cartoon, but NOT the character she was previously. This is never explained. Now she wants to climb a Las Vegas hotel to touch some spiky neon light that is going to ‘fix’ her. This is never explained. Now Gabriel Byrne has super powers in the real world? This is never explained!
Paramount Pictures paid $30 million to produce this pile of radioactive garbage.
This is never explained.

The Rachel Maddow Show (2008)
dragonfly 13 points 3 years ago.

“This guy” ? Are you trying to make some kind of sexist gender put down? Is name calling your best shot? Somebody else feed this sad troll.

somniloquist 7 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

Oh yeah. It’s happy hour somewhere, ‘cause these shots are CHEAP.

I Bury the Living (1958)
somniloquist 3 points 3 years ago*. (Contains Spoilers)

The only movie I’ve ever seen to make push pins sinister. And possibly the most egregious Scottish accent ever committed to film.

Brave New World (2020)
xerox 6 points 3 years ago*. (Contains Spoilers)

Hi,just in case you don’t remember in the book itself children are taught with erotic games and have their minds programmed to be hyper sexual via mind control and torture, the book itself does describe orgies. Sex IS used as a foundation for their society.

somniloquist 6 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

Yes, but apparently some of us are on a very tight schedule and only have two minutes a day for nude women. Get ON with it Aldous Huxley, geez!

Vanilla Sky (2001)
[deleted]
somniloquist 2 points 3 years ago*. (Contains Spoilers)

Fine fine fine. You never indulge in a healthy round of third-personry?
Wait. Actually. Vanilla Sky may be the one place we could discuss “referring to yourself as if you’re not there.”

Vanilla Sky (2001)
[deleted]
somniloquist 2 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

Oh no no. She’s not crazy enough for the chat. Not just yet.

Vanilla Sky (2001)
[deleted]
somniloquist 2 points 3 years ago*. (Contains Spoilers)

The VERY occasional advantage of being quite short.

Vanilla Sky (2001)
[deleted]
somniloquist 2 points 3 years ago. (Contains Spoilers)

Honk honk.