random000 : The doc says it all. The most destructive source to civilisation that must be exterminated...
random000 : Thank you. Good watch. This corrosive criminal element has no right to exist as it has for...
Lazeistheman2 : "its a good show" "its only 24 years old" "Let's take over the comments with ridiculous ra...
random000 : Unlisted but starring Ariana Richards (girl in Jurassic Park) as the girl of interest.
Mandalorian : We need season two right away!
Hans Zarkov : I'd recommend Farscape, it shared a lot of the same elements as SG:A in terms of creativit...
random000 : Andromeda is good, but Farscape is very superior. Not once did it search for itself or the...
grasshopper rex : After almost 5 years of fearmongering and stoking division, how could they be so utterly u...
Hans Zarkov : It started out well but that last season, where the "already pushing the Sorbo saturation ...
First of all, you’re putting words in my mouth. The only argument I have made is not the existence of a deity or deities but simply that because. humans possess things like an appreciation for beauty, an understanding of morality, a conscience, etc… means that we are not animals. That is not an argument you accept. Am I correct in assuming that you consider these things to be identifiers of us as a species?
morality as we call it is a human construct and even in humans differs depending on race etc . Morality is taught to us as we grow and is a very new thing in terms of human evolution . Modern man would consider early man lacking morality for instance so by your definition we evolved from animals . If that is true then all animals are capable of evolving and developing “ morality “ you say animals do not have “ an appreciation for beauty, an understanding of morality, a conscience, etc” is that something you choose to believe because it simply isnt true , scientists have discovered the early signs of morality in apes and also believe that animals select mates on beauty