People Magazine Investigates: Cults (2018)
Krakken -1 points 4 years ago.

no just because they seen something they couldn’t understand in no way means a god, or spirit was there! and if your neighbors cat is there you can see it, touch it, feed it, A god you cant on any of those levels! so your implication is as idiotic as a god caring about what you do and who you sleep with! documented delusions withy beings in a dream are pathetic at best!

nikkimckelvy -4 points 4 years ago.

Let’s continue the metaphor. You make the assumption that the cat out of the house. Some cats are indoors only. It doesn’t matter whether or not I see the cat. My belief has no effect on it’s existence. I can choose to not believe that they have a cat and they’ve got one-even if I’ve never seen it. Disbelief in something doesn’t effect it’s existence.
They belief system you are describing is called, “God of the gaps.” It basically states that people have no explanation for a scientific occurrence so they attribute that occurrence to God. If you study philosophy, you’ll learn about it. Here’s the rub with it. Even if you were to discover a scientific explaination for every, single thing on the planet, you would still not disprove God’s existence. As the supposed atheist, it is your job to disprove God’s existence, and God of the gaps, doesn’t do that. It simply states there is another explanation for the same thing. God could just as easily have created whatever it was that caused the scientific phenomena.
Additionally, you still haven’t explained the countless billions of lives who have been transformed and improved by people believing, following, and accepting God.