random000 : For those who really dig Roddenberry, then this non-science fiction drive-in flick was big...
random000 : After Roddenberry's Genesis ii, John Saxon starred in this sci-fi story that has that doom...
expresso : That was one of my five theories
MelBert8929 : I thought it was a great show when it came out. I liked Sorbo in Hercules and I thought th...
Lulusbay : I thought about this while I was watching... and agree. KS is a great actor, but a flawed ...
etim : HA! I knew it! (At least that's what I was hoping it would be).
mkmikas : i thought that polymath club was a bit cultish
hellsingfan01 : Yeah same here I'm even trying to find links to some more episodes of the recent season 13...
Bluecannon - temporarily banned for calling someone an idiot. Can’t post for 24 hours. This is the workaround.
This is just going round and round. I called out hypocrisy. That doesn’t mean that I liked the film. I said that the film had a message that people aren’t getting. Again, doesn’t mean I like the film. People like YOU are taking it personal, jumping in, paraphrasing, and distorting. That’s a really interesting reaction to someone saying that a film has a message. Chill out.
Bluecannon : I DON’T care if you like the film or not. And I never said I liked it. What I said is that there’s a message in the film, and the faux uproar is overshadowing it. Why do I call it faux? You prove it when you said that an 11 year old exposes her breast. That’s not in the film. A US senator claimed it was, and you bought into it. And then, you’re spreading the misinformation along. It’s fake, because even those who obviously haven’t seen the film are getting all offended. It’s ridiculous.
Then on the other side of the spectrum, you’ve got ShiftyPickle paraphrasing.
I said preteens are discovering their bodies. He / she interprets that as meaning they’re exploring their sexuality. See what I mean? Distortion again.
The uproar about this film smacks of hypocrisy. No uproar when we see:
And NOW you want to show your outrage? Ummmm, okay. It seems people don’t complain seeing the end result of a dance routine featuring kids acting more adult than their ages (like I said, you see this stuff on television weekly in dance competition shows), but let’s bring out the pitchforks and clutch our pearls if a film shows the actual rehearsal process of the routine because…well…THAT just crosses the line (eye-roll).
Guess what? There’s an actual message in this film - maybe you’d pick up on that instead of focusing on the dance moves and its perceived titillation.
And FYI, in real life, 11 year old preteens are discovering their bodies. It’s called puberty. You can be shocked that a film DARE address the issue and dangers of preteens on social media - or you can accept the facts of life, that this IS the fact of life. But the faux puritanical outrage? Give me a break…
These comments are coming from people who don’t have kids or significant others. Full stop, and they probably shouldn’t. Tiktok and social media is the biggest influence on this younger generation. The only way you can hide it is to become amish. I skimmed through the movie watched the beginning and it’s pretty fricking relatable.
These comments are amazing especially how they make it political. Deep state lizard people…. lmao… ok. Guess what trump has sponsored child beauty pageants for past 40 years. Some of you need to seek real mental health specialists.