ΜΥΓΑΣ : Contains spoilers. Click to show. I don't get it. She seeks revenge serving those that she hates? Can someone please explai...
random000 : The doc says it all. The most destructive source to civilisation that must be exterminated...
random000 : Thank you. Good watch. This corrosive criminal element has no right to exist as it has for...
Lazeistheman2 : "its a good show" "its only 24 years old" "Let's take over the comments with ridiculous ra...
random000 : Unlisted but starring Ariana Richards (girl in Jurassic Park) as the girl of interest.
Hans Zarkov : I'd recommend Farscape, it shared a lot of the same elements as SG:A in terms of creativit...
random000 : Andromeda is good, but Farscape is very superior. Not once did it search for itself or the...
grasshopper rex : After almost 5 years of fearmongering and stoking division, how could they be so utterly u...
Hans Zarkov : It started out well but that last season, where the "already pushing the Sorbo saturation ...
I recently revisited this film, after having only seen it once about 20 years ago. Suffice to say, I didn’t enjoy it even the second time around.
While in technique, it is a “good” film—- excellent acting, expert camera work, appropriate lighting — it felt entirely too long. The brief description above is pretty accurate. That is, this is not an action movie, and has very little “action” to speak of.
We see a talented artist trying to translate his conflicting infatuation and annoyance (hence, the title) with his muse. From there goes on scene after scene of an impatient, frustrated girl, sitting uncomfortably for a somewhat cold painter. The questions “truth, life and artistic limits” are laid out, but in the most listless, rambling way. Conversations between the artist and model are deadpan, flat and similarly cold, with very little breaking up the monotony.
Whenever the pace happens to pick up, I found it disappointing that these swells of tension didn’t really lead anywhere. I’m not the sort that needs every single metaphor or double meaning explained to me, but perhaps I found their conversations dull because I personally found the characters unrelatable. That said, there are several instances where you’d think something dramatic or important is about to happen, only instead, the model and artist are arguing again. It just feels rather shallow for something that goes on well beyond 2 hours.
This was labeled an “erotic drama”, yet it’s hardly arousing (unless you’re counting a nude figure art model as “eroticism”) and the drama rarely veers beyond arguing. If anything, it maintains a passive aggressive vibe throughout. The title is oddly fitting, as the film is technically ‘beautiful’, yet…annoying to watch.
To me, this is the type of film that steers less-adventurous movie fans away from (so-called) “foreign films” (or more specifically, the stereotype that French films are boring, inexplicable and pretentious).
Perhaps, though, I missed something? I’d love to hear someone else’s opinion on this one.