….wait…reporting? That’s like saying drawing two lego bricks next to each other is architecture. This guy Maddow is no journalist.

So you’re stating that past political opponents to Trump who were in power confirmed that there was and is no collusion between Trumps campaign and Russia are talking crazy crap?

Under oath figures running the country under President Obama including Obamas security advisor Susan Rice, former DNI James Clapper, former US ambassador Sam Power, Ben Rhodes, former AG Loretta lynch, former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe know nothing compared to YOU…if I were you I’d carry on bouncing your red rubber ball and keep trying to bounce it oh so high…

Oh my…and this is why guys such as Maddow keep pumping out a deliberately false narrative and calling it journalism.

Yes it begins with two bricks as you state, but to go to such extremes to justify this guy Maddow as a journalist is very… hysterical. It also highlights your lack of knowledge into what research genuinely is if you actually were serious in using that word in the same sentence as the Maddow show.

I’m guessing you don’t believe that good journalism should also retract stories that they publish that are then proven to be baseless and incorrect?

It’s a good job people make sure those two bricks are correctly laid in the foundations before building upon them….

“We should all have the right to travel anywhere in the world…”

No, no you shouldn’t and rightly don’t, just as nobody should have the right to just enter your property. I take it you have doors, locks, fences, gates etc on your property, or do you believe in borders or controlled entry when it just concerns things you own?

I repeat again…why would several of his political opponents under OATH, whom were in power at the time, say to the House intelligence committees investigation into Russian collusion that there was no evidence of ANY collusion between Donald Trump, his campaign or Russia? Now lying under oath to the house intelligence committee is a very serious offence so I think they place their careers and possible freedom way above your convincing argument of how you saw a YouTube video…now as convincing as you think your “argument” is, normal people would say their testimony is more valuable.

As you are well in the know can you tell us with the relevant quote what Trump has said?

Well everyone who has bothered to look into this collusion hoax, or can read and understand the words, has seen every Obama administration figures questioned under oath…OATH…state that there is and was no evidence of collusion.

I repeat, as you know different, what position in the Obama administration did you hold that gave you access to intelligence that Susan Rice and co did not have?

…just like senior figures in the Obama administration admitted under oath that there was no evidence of Russian collusion. You seem to have been a more prominent figure in Obama’s government than people such as Susan Rice though so seem to know better…

You got any basis of evidence for that or are you doing a “Maddow” by making assumptions and running with them based on nothing whatsoever?

One of my pet favourites. It was very underrated even when it first came out and nobody I know has ever heard about it, let alone having viewed it…also it is one of Dan Aykroyds best in my opinion. The cast too is an impressive line up.

…yes, best not to say anymore Mr Maddow.

Again, why would the Obama administration, his political opponents in power with access to intelligence, state under oath that there was no collusion?

I repeat again, can you quote us on what Trump said and where as you are seemingly more in the know than Obamas security advisor Susan Rice, former DNI James Clapper, former US ambassador Sam Power, Ben Rhodes, former AG Loretta lynch, former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe…by the way, Susan rice is being touted by CNN and MSNBC as Joe Biden’s possible vice president choice…yet here you are saying you know more than her, Obama’s government and the American intelligence agencies…sigh

So you are saying that you have access to secretive information from the Obama administration before January 2017 that contradicts Obamas security advisor Susan Rice, former DNI James Clapper, former US ambassador Sam Power, Ben Rhodes, former AG Loretta lynch, former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe? May I ask what position you held in the Obama administration that gave you access to information that these people didnt have?

Because the above mentioned stated under oath that there was no evidence of collusion…odd that eh?

What were his words?

So you can’t provide this evidence you have seemingly witnessed that has somehow evaded Pelosi, Schumer, Schiff and other high ranking Democrats?

Also…THEY WRRE THERE! Trump did not come into power until January 2017. Russian alleged collusion was before and during the 2016 Presidential election…so the Obama administration had access TO ALL INTELLIGENCE.

You don’t and never have.

They did.

You didn’t.

Hence why your statement that you saw it in a YouTube video is rather laughingly sad when you base it over genuine testimony.

Send me a private message and I’ll break it down into small segments for you to understand x